Another Proposal for Protecting Consumers When It Comes to Concert Tickets

Another Proposal for Protecting Consumers When It Comes to Concert Tickets
 Why can’t the live event industry?  
 
What every consumer, industry stakeholder, and government wants for their constituents is to be well-served. Read the whole story here.  And it’s not because of security, which is run separately by both the TSA and CATSA.  
Of course, there are no comparable’s if you ignore another global industry also selling tickets for seats; the airlines.  

The airlines simply set the ground rules, and no one says, “It is my ticket, and I should be able to do what I want with it”. He sent me this:
Can you think of any other industry where you pay a premium for a new product (or service), and when you go to use it, it might not work and you can’t get another?  
Although “bots” are currently making headlines worldwide, they are not the problem in live events. Enacting policies around authentication was the right solution. I’ve had some conversations with Alan Geland, the founder of Fair Ticket Solutions, a company based out of Vancouver that’s looking to bring the sale of concert tickets (and tickets for theatre productions and sporting events) into the 21st century by proposing ideas that protect consumers.  
 
Its time media became better educated, and share their powerful voice with both consumers and legislatures to much better protect all. Which is ludicrous when you consider that there is far more at stake in the airline industry when a seat is sold. It doesn’t exist in any other industry, so why here? It’s not.  
What follows are a set of questions and suggestions to make those things a reality. It doesn’t exist in any other industry, so why in live events?   But in live events, it doesn’t exist.  The easy answer is because the public’s perception is that the live events industry should not be allowed to, and governments believe same.  Because the airlines manage to retain control over their tickets until their passengers enter the plane. It doesn’t account for the lost experience or expense to see the event. It would have eliminated fraud, and allowed industry to use technology to protect consumers in many ways, such as the detection and elimination of bots, and the implementation of price caps at an artist’s request. Can you think of any other industry where you pay a premium for a new product or service, and when you go to use it, it might not work and you can’t get another? Alan is speaking of his recent piece in The Globe and Mail:

In 2015, when the government passed an amendment to the Ticket Speculation Act, they got it half right. It’s unconscionable!  They are just one of the symptoms. There is only one rule that requires anyone entering or leaving the US to have their name on the TSA manifests 1 hour prior to scheduled departure.  But the government caved to resellers and added in a money-back guarantee, creating an illusion of consumer protection. That’s it.   

Are you aware there are no laws that prohibit a consumer from transferring or selling an airline ticket in North America?None!  So why is it the airline industry doesn’t have similar problems despite welcoming their customers to print paper tickets at home? In so doing, it allowed any non-authorized reseller to sell a fake ticket to a live event, giving the consumer a false confidence that a money-back guarantee was satisfactory.   Tickets for use internally in the US and Canada aren’t subject to that requirement, nor is leaving or entering Canada. It also doesn’t account for the fear that many people have, when purchasing tickets from secondary-market resellers, that they might be turned away at the gate with a fake ticket.